Added: Darin Eccleston - Date: 21.09.2021 04:42 - Views: 17570 - Clicks: 4703
Last Name. Share this. Follow Ballotpedia. This measure was put on the ballot by a successful veto referendum petition. Measure C was put on the ballot to approve or reject an ordinance adopted by the city council on August 30, This ordinance, known as Ordinancewould have added a new chapter to the Santa Rosa Municipal code regarding residential rental unit rent and eviction. Ordinance was deed to repeal and replace ordinances, and The provisions repealing these prior laws were not targeted by Measure C, which means that those ordinances remain repealed regardless of the outcome of Measure C.
Ordinance and were enacted to place a day moratorium on rent increases, while was related to just cause evictions. In general, Measure C was deed to apply only to residential rental units, though the ordinance was also deed to exempt specific types of residences. Rental units that are duplexes; triplexes if the owner lives in one of the units; single dwelling homes or condos; and units owned, subsidized or regulated by a governmental agency would not have been subject to the measure's provisions.
Units that were issued a certificate of occupancy after February and that are exempt under the Costa-Hawkins Housing Act would also have been exempt from Measure C. Transient occupancy units, such as hotels; institutional residences, such as care facilities or fraternity houses; rooms rented to boarders; second dwellings; and mobile homes subject to the Mobilehome Residency Law would not have been affected by Measure C. If it had been approved, Measure C would have reset rents to those that were in effect on January 1, Measure C was deed to allow landlords to increase rents up to three percent each year, but would have provided for an appeal process to allow landlords to request rent larger rent increases and tenants to request reduced rent.
Under the ordinance, landlords would have had the ability to request rental rate increases of greater than three percent, and tenants could have requested a reduction in rent. In both cases, the request would have been submitted to the program administrator, who would have made a decision.
In cases where both the landlord and tenant agreed to the decision, both would have ed a document setting forth any new rental rates and the effective date. In cases where one of the parties was not satisfied with the program administrator's decision, they could have filed a request for a hearing to dispute the decision.
In these cases, a rent dispute hearing officer would have heard the case and made a decision. This decision would have been final and binding, unless judicial review was sought. The ordinance was deed to protect renters from being evicted without just cause just cause would be defined as situations in which a tenant fails to pay rent or violates the lease agreement. Tenants could have also been evicted in certain "no fault" circumstances such as when a landlord decides to move into a rental unit permanently or decides to withdraw the unit from the rental market.
Measure C was deed to provide for the administration of the program by the city through a program fee. The fee would be paid to the city annually by landlords, though the ordinance allows half of the fee to be passed on to the tenants. The ordinance was deed to allow the city to issue citations to landlords for violations. In addition, if a landlord violated the ordinance three or more times, it would have been considered a misdemeanor. The city council would have reviewed the ordinance on a yearly basis and at any other time when the vacancy rate rose above five percent for 12 months.
The following question appeared on the ballot: . Shall those provisions of the City of Santa Rosa Residential Rent Stabilization and Other Tenant Protections Ordinance that establish rent control for certain residential rental properties, prohibit landlords from evicting tenants of certain properties except for specified reasons, and provide other protections to tenants, be approved? The following impartial analysis of the measure was prepared by the office of the Santa Rosa City Attorney:.
Generally, landlords may set the amount of rent charged to tenants, and may evict a tenant for any reason except for an unlawful reason, such as unlawful discrimination. Under some circumstances, a city may adopt an ordinance to limit rents for certain residential rental units and may restrict the reasons why landlords may evict tenants. Certain residents of the City challenged the Ordinance through a referendum petition.
The City Council has placed a measure on the ballot asking voters whether to approve the Ordinance. If approved, the Ordinance will reset rents to the rents that were in effect on January 1,but tenants will not be reimbursed for any increase in rents that were in place between January 1, and the effective date of the Ordinance.
Not all residential rental units in the City are subject to the Ordinance. The Ordinance does not apply to single family residences including condominiumsduplexes, triplexes where the owner resides in one of the three units and multi-family units for which the initial certificate of occupancy was issued after February 1, The Ordinance makes it unlawful for a landlord to retaliate against a tenant for exercising rights under the Ordinance and imposes fines and penalties for violating the Ordinance.
The full text of the measure is available here. The following individuals ed the official argument in favor of the measure: . At a Sonoma County Alliance meeting, Julie Combs, a Santa Rosa council member, argued that Measure C prevents current residents from being displaced and pointed out that the measure was deed with a sunset clause to lift restrictions when the vacancy rate reaches five percent.
The following official argument was submitted in favor of the measure: . Reduce crime with stable neighborhoods and less renter turnover. Improve learning by keeping students from being moved from school to school. Benefit public health by decreasing stress related to repeated moves and eviction threats.Granny, Granny Chapter Two, Granny 3, Granny House, Ice Adventure, Sponge Granny, Santa Granny,Bandi
Support local businesses due to residents having more money to spend at local stores, and not just for rent. Our housing crisis affects our entire community. College students sleep in their cars. Mothers are evicted for no reason.
Now 12, rental units that would be covered by rent control face unaffordable rent increases. Measure C will help immediately, providing dignity, stability and a better community for everyone. The following individuals ed the official argument against the measure: . The following organizations were listed as endorsing a "no" vote on Measure C: . The following individuals were listed as endorsing a "no" vote on Measure C: .
At a Sonoma County Alliance meeting, Tom Schwedhelm, a Santa Rosa council member, argued that rent control was too extreme for Santa Rosa and served to distract from the issue of needing to build more housing. The following official argument was submitted in opposition to the measure: . Affordable housing is a real problem in Santa Rosa, but Measure C is not the answer.
It will cost taxpayers millions, have unintended consequences on neighborhood safety, and will not provide any new affordable housing options for Santa Rosa families. Measure C does nothing to address homelessness, provide new affordable housing or lower rents. Renters in singlefamily homes, condominiums, duplexes, owner-occupied triplexes, and apartments built after will not be covered by the provisions of Measure C. In fact, it could reduce the amount of affordable rental housing in Santa Rosa by reducing turnover and allowing any available housing covered by Measure C to go to residents with higher credit scores and income levels, instead of prioritizing those units for seniors, families and other residents who actually need affordable housing.
Measure C also makes evicting problem tenants virtually impossible. Those who put the safety of their neighbors at-risk by dealing drugs or engaging in other dangerous activities will be safeguarded from evictions, degrading neighborhood quality of life. Voting No on Measure C is a vote to keep fair and equitable housing for all our residents. Vote No on Measure C. As of November 1,one committee had registered to support Measure C, and one had registered to oppose it. Below are the top donors in support of Measure C: . Below are the top donors in opposition to Measure C: .
Ballotpedia has not found any media editorials in favor of Measure C. Please send any information about media editorials in favor of Measure C to editor ballotpedia. According to the U. Census, the residential rental vacancy rate in Santa Rosa was 3. Between the years andthe rate fluctuated between 4. In From tothe percent of occupied homes that were occupied by renters varied between From tothe percent fluctuated between On December 6,council member Chris Coursey defeated fellow member Tom Schwedhelm in a vote by the city council to become mayor.
The deciding vote came down to newly elected Jack Tibbetts who expressed support for rent control and just cause for eviction throughout his campaign. Invoters in the California cities of Mountain View and Richmond approved measures that established maximum rent increases and prohibited evictions without just cause. Following the passage of the measures, the California Apartment Association filed lawsuits against the measures, claiming the laws constituted illegal takings.
In Maythe association announced they decided to abandon the lawsuits and focus anti-rent control efforts elsewhere. Proponents of rent control believe that the suspension of legal action by the association could make other cities more likely to enact ordinances due to a decreased risk of legal challenge.
Similar measures were on the November ballots in Burlingame and San Mateobut they were not approved. Measure L1, which approved a city ordinance adopted by the city council in Marchwas approved, while Measure M1, which would have adjusted the ordinance, was defeated.
John Sawyer, who was the mayor at the time, recused himself from the vote, though he ed the arguments against Measure C as a council member. Following the passage of the ordinance, opponents of the law gathered veto referendum petition atures to force the city council to either repeal the law or put the matter before voters. Petitioners needed to gather at least 8, valid atures in order to force a referendum.
In Septembera property manager aligned with the California Apartment Association turned in 12, atures.
Sonoma County elections officials found 9, atures were valid in Decemberwhich caused the referendum to be sent to the city council. On March 7,the city council voted to put the ordinance on the ballot as Measure C rather than repealing it. One council member was absent from the vote.
The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Santa Rosa Local rent control Measure C. These are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles. What's on my ballot? Elections in How to vote How to run for office Ballot measures. Who represents me? President U. Ballotpedia featuresencyclopedic articles written and curated by our professional staff of editors, writers, and researchers. Share this Follow Ballotpedia. What's on your ballot?
Jump to:search. Local measures. Local measures in Local rent control on the ballot Local housing on the ballot Sonoma County measures.
News and analysis. State and local preemption conflicts Measures advancing national agendas. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. : Local ballots, California local ballot measures Local rent control, California, Local housing, California, Local measure in Santa Rosa, California Local measure in county of Sonoma, California Local measure, June 6, Notable local measure, Certified past date local ballot measures Defeated local measure, Government U.
email: [email protected] - phone:(864) 438-3551 x 1383
Single Crewe Grannies Interested In Grannies Dating